THIS WEBSITE WAS MADE DURING THE 2010 ELECTION, SOME MATERIALS ARE DATED
POPADITCH MAKES MOVIE TO GET THE RECORD STRAIGHT JUNE 9
MORE AT: http://sandiegopatriots.com/?p=2703
It's been a fun campaign, but the people have spoken! (give us barabbas)
It's up to the people that are close to Nick to convince him to run again.
It's hard to believe we could get a better candidate in 2012
and the new redistricting would make it MUCH easier for any other candidate to win
Dem's dealt crushing blow in House and Senate
CAN YOU HEAR US NOW?
This is YOUR Congressman
Bob Filner GET INVOLVED Donate Join South Bay Tea Party(here)
This is one of the more Extreme US congressmen in congress. He is there because he has a massive war chest of funds he gets every year from the public workers union.(contributor records link)
Voted in Favor of Partial Birth Abortion Proof Links HERE and HERE
One good thing about Filner is he doesn’t sit on the fence and hold a squishy middle ground; this Guy is as far left as you get on every issue. Follow some links I put together to see the records
His membership with the A.C.L.U and the Sierra club are molding his decisions from the water problems of California to the national security issues worldwide, and local Issues like voting to remove the Mount Soledad Cross.(proof link)
I believe that if the public at large found out his radical views, they might think twice about voting him in again.
His father was a communist Leader and he is a founder of the Socialist Party of America http://www.keywiki.org/index.php/Joseph_Filner#Communist_Party. (socialist links here)
Disclaimer: This website is only stating FACTS. We will not use unverified information. And We do what we do WITH OR WITHOUT the POPADITCH campaign's permission. as of Aug 12 We have not even spoken to him or his campaign. That being said....GO GUNNY POPADITCH
Voted in Favor of Partial Birth Abortion Proof Links HERE and HERE
One good thing about Filner is he doesn’t sit on the fence and hold a squishy middle ground; this Guy is as far left as you get on every issue. Follow some links I put together to see the records
His membership with the A.C.L.U and the Sierra club are molding his decisions from the water problems of California to the national security issues worldwide, and local Issues like voting to remove the Mount Soledad Cross.(proof link)
I believe that if the public at large found out his radical views, they might think twice about voting him in again.
His father was a communist Leader and he is a founder of the Socialist Party of America http://www.keywiki.org/index.php/Joseph_Filner#Communist_Party. (socialist links here)
Disclaimer: This website is only stating FACTS. We will not use unverified information. And We do what we do WITH OR WITHOUT the POPADITCH campaign's permission. as of Aug 12 We have not even spoken to him or his campaign. That being said....GO GUNNY POPADITCH
November 1, NEWS ALERT
Brietbart's" Big Government" reveals:
Bob Filner Kissing Married Southwest airline lobbyist who received lots of Taxpayer $$$$ for company
(full story here)
Bob Filner releases Sleazy misleading TV attack ad
November 1st Filner cancels Interview
Sunday Morning Interview (Thank you KUSI)
Cong. Bob Filner caught Running from 10 news reporter after another Sleezy Stunt
Video shows how open he is after 18 years in politics (oct 29th)
Click Here to see Debate from Desert
Popaditch vs. Filner
No one has seen this Debate on Television. K.U.S.I. drove 125 miles to the desert to film it, but Didn't show it or post it online. That's why Filner went there.
We here in San Diego Deserve to hear and see an Election Debate or Town-Hall Meeting.
We here in San Diego are Demanding Bob Filner keep his promise
Brit Hume and Channel 7 talk about
Bob Filners past arrests
(While in Office)
Did you know about this???? Why is this guy still in office????
UPDATE: Just served court summons to face assault charges June 15, 2010)
LINK HERE
Bob Filner has such contempt for his Voters that he will make some drive 2 hours and 40 minutes, and 127 miles across the Imperial Valley desert to see a debate, he is obviously afraid to face the majority of his Voters.
PICKETING BOB FILNERS OFFICE EVERY Thursday at 4:00
Come and help us get Bob Filner out Into the open 10/28
333 F st. Chula Vista 4pm to 5:30 have Extra signs on-site
The people of the 51st District will be picketing Bob Filners office from now until the election, or until Bob Filner faces his constituents with the reasons for his BAD decisions at a Town Hall meeting, and Election debate with Nick Popaditch.Events that are unannounced or are 2-3 hours away from main office will not stop the picketing(we know how you
operate Bob)
EMAIL me at VoteTheBumOut@gmail.com to be a part of it. Or just show up
More Pics and Video here
Here are some questions the 51st District want to ask: (click here)
operate Bob)
EMAIL me at VoteTheBumOut@gmail.com to be a part of it. Or just show up
More Pics and Video here
Here are some questions the 51st District want to ask: (click here)
Oct. 8th Bob Filner urges the president to pass another damaging climate change bill
full story (Here)
VoteTheBumOut.com is getting attention from numorous blogs now (click Here)
Oct 15, 2010 Bob Filner and Duncan Hunter
After watching this video you will see why Filner refuses to hold town-hall meetings, or local debate Nick Popaditch
Truck banners hit the streets
Multiple Mobile truck signs hit the streets during peak commute hours
To be a part of removing Filner from office:
Email: VoteTheBumOut@gmail.com
We need your help, Please be part of the "SILENT NO MORE CROWD"
Multiple Mobile truck signs hit the streets during peak commute hours
To be a part of removing Filner from office:
Email: VoteTheBumOut@gmail.com
We need your help, Please be part of the "SILENT NO MORE CROWD"
Just a few of Bob Filner's Votes (more here)
*Voted yes (with only one other Rep.) to remove the mount soledad Cross Filner is a
Proud member of "Cross Chasers United" (The A.C.L.U.)
http://www.kpbs.org/news/2006/aug/14/president-bush-to-sign-mt-soledad-cross/
Voted yes for $825 Billion Stimulus plan http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2009/roll046.xml
*Voted YES on $192B additional anti-recession stimulus spending. (Jul 2009)
*Voted yes for "Cap and Trade" http://www.votesmart.org/issue_keyvote_detail.php?cs_id=26496&can_id=26774
*Voted Yes to Partial birth Abortions http://www.ontheissues.org/CA/Bob_Filner_Abortion.htm#2000-104
Why is he still in office you Ask?? ------Because The Good people in 51st District haven't heard these things yet.
And the Media will not tell you, The Filner campaign won't either. And the Popaditch campaign only runs a "positive campaign"
Please think about going to the help page; all we have to do is educate the people.
Self-government is not possible unless the citizens are educated sufficiently to enable them to exercise oversight.
-Thomas Jefferson-
Proud member of "Cross Chasers United" (The A.C.L.U.)
http://www.kpbs.org/news/2006/aug/14/president-bush-to-sign-mt-soledad-cross/
Voted yes for $825 Billion Stimulus plan http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2009/roll046.xml
*Voted YES on $192B additional anti-recession stimulus spending. (Jul 2009)
*Voted yes for "Cap and Trade" http://www.votesmart.org/issue_keyvote_detail.php?cs_id=26496&can_id=26774
*Voted Yes to Partial birth Abortions http://www.ontheissues.org/CA/Bob_Filner_Abortion.htm#2000-104
Why is he still in office you Ask?? ------Because The Good people in 51st District haven't heard these things yet.
And the Media will not tell you, The Filner campaign won't either. And the Popaditch campaign only runs a "positive campaign"
Please think about going to the help page; all we have to do is educate the people.
Self-government is not possible unless the citizens are educated sufficiently to enable them to exercise oversight.
-Thomas Jefferson-
Did you know Congressman Bob filner grew up with a Communist father, and is a founding member of the Democratic Socialists of America.
Why is he still in office?? answer........... Unions (contributor records link)(link#2)
Click on to read proof sources: here and here and here and here
Why is he still in office?? answer........... Unions (contributor records link)(link#2)
Click on to read proof sources: here and here and here and here
KUSI asks the candidates question's. There is a HUGE contrast in belief systems here.
Bob Filner (In Office) Nick Popaditch (running for Office)
Since Filner refuses open debate,you need to judge from KUSI interviews who's real, and who's fake!
Now that you can see them side by side, ask yourself these questions:
Does Honesty and openness matter??Who is more likely to take a BRIBE?? Who will put you first and themselves last.
The Answers to these Questions actually matter this year
Does Honesty and openness matter??Who is more likely to take a BRIBE?? Who will put you first and themselves last.
The Answers to these Questions actually matter this year
Ever wonder how Obama, Pelosi, Reid and Filner can talk so much and say nothing at all. Or how they appear to blame others when they have FULL CONTROL of the Congress, Senate and White house???
It's Saul Alinsky word manipulation tricks
(Press Sec. Robert Gibbs is the MASTER of these tactics)
1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don't discuss it -- especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it's not reported, it didn't happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.
2. Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the "How dare you!" gambit.
3. Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such "arguable rumors". If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a "wild rumor" which can have no basis in fact.
4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.
5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as "kooks", "right-wing", "liberal", "left-wing", "terrorists", "conspiracy buffs", "radicals", "militia", "racists", "religious fanatics", "sexual deviates", and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.
6. Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain criticism reasoning -- simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent's viewpoint.
7. Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could so taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.
8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough "jargon" and "minutiae" to illustrate you are "one who knows", and simply say it isn't so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.
9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues with denial they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.
10. Associate opponent charges with old news. A derivative of the straw man usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with. Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually them be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues -- so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source.
11. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions. Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the "high road" and "confess" with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made -- but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, "just isn't so." Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later. Done properly, this can garner sympathy and respect for "coming clean" and "owning up" to your mistakes without addressing more serious issues.
12. Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to loose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues.
13. Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards with an apparent deductive logic in a way that forbears any actual material fact.
14. Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best for items qualifying for rule 10.
15. Fit the facts to alternate conclusions. This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in place.
16. Vanishing evidence and witnesses. If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won't have to address the issue.
17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can "argue" with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.
18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can't do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how "sensitive they are to criticism".
19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the "play dumb" rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon). In order to completely avoid discussing issues may require you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance.
20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications.
21. Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or other empowered investigative body. Subvert the (process) to your benefit and effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion. Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret when properly handled. For instance, if you own the prosecuting attorney, it can insure a Grand Jury hears no useful evidence and that the evidence is sealed an unavailable to subsequent investigators. Once a favorable verdict (usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking to frame a victim) is achieved, the matter can be considered officially closed.
22. Manufacture a new truth. Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively.
23. Create bigger distractions. If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events such as trials, create bigger news stories (or treat them as such) to distract the multitudes.
24. Silence critics. If the above methods do not prevail, consider removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address issues is removed entirely. This can be by their death, arrest and detention, blackmail or destruction of their character by release of blackmail information, or merely by proper intimidation with blackmail or other threats.
25. Vanish. If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the issues, vacate the kitchen.
2. Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the "How dare you!" gambit.
3. Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such "arguable rumors". If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a "wild rumor" which can have no basis in fact.
4. Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.
5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary attack the messenger ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as "kooks", "right-wing", "liberal", "left-wing", "terrorists", "conspiracy buffs", "radicals", "militia", "racists", "religious fanatics", "sexual deviates", and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.
6. Hit and Run. In any public forum, make a brief attack of your opponent or the opponent position and then scamper off before an answer can be fielded, or simply ignore any answer. This works extremely well in Internet and letters-to-the-editor environments where a steady stream of new identities can be called upon without having to explain criticism reasoning -- simply make an accusation or other attack, never discussing issues, and never answering any subsequent response, for that would dignify the opponent's viewpoint.
7. Question motives. Twist or amplify any fact which could so taken to imply that the opponent operates out of a hidden personal agenda or other bias. This avoids discussing issues and forces the accuser on the defensive.
8. Invoke authority. Claim for yourself or associate yourself with authority and present your argument with enough "jargon" and "minutiae" to illustrate you are "one who knows", and simply say it isn't so without discussing issues or demonstrating concretely why or citing sources.
9. Play Dumb. No matter what evidence or logical argument is offered, avoid discussing issues with denial they have any credibility, make any sense, provide any proof, contain or make a point, have logic, or support a conclusion. Mix well for maximum effect.
10. Associate opponent charges with old news. A derivative of the straw man usually, in any large-scale matter of high visibility, someone will make charges early on which can be or were already easily dealt with. Where it can be foreseen, have your own side raise a straw man issue and have it dealt with early on as part of the initial contingency plans. Subsequent charges, regardless of validity or new ground uncovered, can usually them be associated with the original charge and dismissed as simply being a rehash without need to address current issues -- so much the better where the opponent is or was involved with the original source.
11. Establish and rely upon fall-back positions. Using a minor matter or element of the facts, take the "high road" and "confess" with candor that some innocent mistake, in hindsight, was made -- but that opponents have seized on the opportunity to blow it all out of proportion and imply greater criminalities which, "just isn't so." Others can reinforce this on your behalf, later. Done properly, this can garner sympathy and respect for "coming clean" and "owning up" to your mistakes without addressing more serious issues.
12. Enigmas have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to loose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues.
13. Alice in Wonderland Logic. Avoid discussion of the issues by reasoning backwards with an apparent deductive logic in a way that forbears any actual material fact.
14. Demand complete solutions. Avoid the issues by requiring opponents to solve the crime at hand completely, a ploy which works best for items qualifying for rule 10.
15. Fit the facts to alternate conclusions. This requires creative thinking unless the crime was planned with contingency conclusions in place.
16. Vanishing evidence and witnesses. If it does not exist, it is not fact, and you won't have to address the issue.
17. Change the subject. Usually in connection with one of the other ploys listed here, find a way to side-track the discussion with abrasive or controversial comments in hopes of turning attention to a new, more manageable topic. This works especially well with companions who can "argue" with you over the new topic and polarize the discussion arena in order to avoid discussing more key issues.
18. Emotionalize, Antagonize, and Goad Opponents. If you can't do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent. Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how "sensitive they are to criticism".
19. Ignore proof presented, demand impossible proofs. This is perhaps a variant of the "play dumb" rule. Regardless of what material may be presented by an opponent in public forums, claim the material irrelevant and demand proof that is impossible for the opponent to come by (it may exist, but not be at his disposal, or it may be something which is known to be safely destroyed or withheld, such as a murder weapon). In order to completely avoid discussing issues may require you to categorically deny and be critical of media or books as valid sources, deny that witnesses are acceptable, or even deny that statements made by government or other authorities have any meaning or relevance.
20. False evidence. Whenever possible, introduce new facts or clues designed and manufactured to conflict with opponent presentations as useful tools to neutralize sensitive issues or impede resolution. This works best when the crime was designed with contingencies for the purpose, and the facts cannot be easily separated from the fabrications.
21. Call a Grand Jury, Special Prosecutor, or other empowered investigative body. Subvert the (process) to your benefit and effectively neutralize all sensitive issues without open discussion. Once convened, the evidence and testimony are required to be secret when properly handled. For instance, if you own the prosecuting attorney, it can insure a Grand Jury hears no useful evidence and that the evidence is sealed an unavailable to subsequent investigators. Once a favorable verdict (usually, this technique is applied to find the guilty innocent, but it can also be used to obtain charges when seeking to frame a victim) is achieved, the matter can be considered officially closed.
22. Manufacture a new truth. Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively.
23. Create bigger distractions. If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events such as trials, create bigger news stories (or treat them as such) to distract the multitudes.
24. Silence critics. If the above methods do not prevail, consider removing opponents from circulation by some definitive solution so that the need to address issues is removed entirely. This can be by their death, arrest and detention, blackmail or destruction of their character by release of blackmail information, or merely by proper intimidation with blackmail or other threats.
25. Vanish. If you are a key holder of secrets or otherwise overly illuminated and you think the heat is getting too hot, to avoid the issues, vacate the kitchen.
Bob Filner want's new $50 Billion Obama Stimulus "3".
Infrastructure bill has no "shovel Ready" jobs
Why doesn't the local media tell you about our elected officials? It took a New Zealand man to expose Bob Filner to the world. He did it August 13, 2010 http://newzeal.blogspot.com/2010/08/bob-filner-red-diaper-baby-and.html
Here are a few Local News sources that would like to hear from you.
10 News Desk: (619) 237-6383
KUSI NEWS 858-571-NEWS (571-6397)
Chan. 8 news Main Station Number 858.571.8888
Chan 7 NBC, part of the problem, dont bother
Fox chan 6 .Phone: (858) 279-6666
FOX 5 Phone (858)492-9269
The San Diego Union-Tribune and SignOnSanDiego.com (800) 533-8830
Rick Roberts 1-800-760-KFMB (5-3-6-2)
KOGO News Tip Line:858-560-6671
roger hedgecock Toll Free 877-84 ROGER
Steve Yuhas 800-600-KOGO(5646)
Chip Franklin Mornings chip@chipfranklin.com
LaDona Harvey ladona@kogo.com
( This is how things get done Folks!)
Here are a few Local News sources that would like to hear from you.
10 News Desk: (619) 237-6383
KUSI NEWS 858-571-NEWS (571-6397)
Chan. 8 news Main Station Number 858.571.8888
Chan 7 NBC, part of the problem, dont bother
Fox chan 6 .Phone: (858) 279-6666
FOX 5 Phone (858)492-9269
The San Diego Union-Tribune and SignOnSanDiego.com (800) 533-8830
Rick Roberts 1-800-760-KFMB (5-3-6-2)
KOGO News Tip Line:858-560-6671
roger hedgecock Toll Free 877-84 ROGER
Steve Yuhas 800-600-KOGO(5646)
Chip Franklin Mornings chip@chipfranklin.com
LaDona Harvey ladona@kogo.com
( This is how things get done Folks!)
Do you know how to get campaign finance cash funneled into your own bank account, without going to jail??? Bob Filner knows: Pay your wife over half a $MILLION$ dollars to help out your "campaign"
Union/Trib. proof link here: http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20051204/news_1m4filner.html
Union/Trib. proof link here: http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20051204/news_1m4filner.html
June 17 2010
Bob Filner uses his time to write a resolution (and asks President Obama) to remove the People's Mujahedin of Iran from the terrorist watch list. The People's Mujahedin of Iran (PMOI, also MEK, MKO) is an Islamic Marxist organization http://cnewsworld.com/featured/lawmakers-seek-to-remove-iranian-organization-from-governments-terrorist-list/
Bob Filner uses his time to write a resolution (and asks President Obama) to remove the People's Mujahedin of Iran from the terrorist watch list. The People's Mujahedin of Iran (PMOI, also MEK, MKO) is an Islamic Marxist organization http://cnewsworld.com/featured/lawmakers-seek-to-remove-iranian-organization-from-governments-terrorist-list/
Update... Filner refuses townhalls, Debates, open questions, but look at the list of fundraisers he has
http://www.bobfilnerforcongress.com/events.asp
(birthday party =fundraiser)(link)
Nick Popaditch Events mostly meet and greet type events
http://www.popaditchforcongress.com/
Update: July 8, Nick Popaditch spends 5 hours answering questions at two townhall meetings (LINK)(events)
Let The smears begin!
Looks like the bob filner crowd is starting early, can you believe how crass and disrespectful this Ad is? (expect only smears from the Filner camp, he sure can't use his record to run on!)
Brad Jennings is the Editor of the Imperial Valley Press for this artical. His contact information is
bjennings@ivpressonline.com or phone 760-337- 3425. Perhaps you can let him know your thoughts on this, I did
CBS KSWT CH. 13 news link on the smear here: http://www.kswt.com/Global/story.asp?S=12791671
L.A. Times Link on the smear here: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2010/07/imperial-valley-newspaper-catches-heat-for-political-cartoon.html
(this is how he got the patch Mr jenning.) ACTUAL FOOTAGE OF NICK POPADITCH IN TANK EXPLOSION click link here
Although Congressman Filner does not do townhall meetings anymore, and he does not do election local debates anymore either, and is afraid to even meet with his constituents(me and a friend have been waiting since last summer) He will take your cash. This man is a Coward, and represents the worst in politicians.
reference: http://politicalpartytime.org/party/21104/
reference: http://politicalpartytime.org/party/21104/
This is HILARIOUS (turn speakers up)
Where's my Congressman?
I think this Funny video was made just for Bob Filner.
from the people at http://heritageforamerica.org
I think this Funny video was made just for Bob Filner.
from the people at http://heritageforamerica.org
Older Entries here
Click on links below top banner to navigate full website, thanks
also, visit www.SanDiegoPatriots.com
Or
San Diego Tea Party at www.WeThePeople2011.com
